Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aleta who wrote (7449)	5/25/1998 11:16:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Respond to of 18444

Aleta, read ALL my words. Please don't operate on an assumption or a presumption of a a categorical idea. When I presented the theoretical possibility that yachting money might be behind the funding for Zulu, you completely passed over the following words which accompanied my remark: "a wild guess on my part." What's always amazed me about this thread is exactly what is written is interpreted, frequently for convenience sake, according to who is writing it and not what actually is stated. For example, when I first came on this thread, I came on defending against what I presumed to be extremely erroneous remarks made against my investment. In effect, I was defensive. Of course, this immediately got labled as hypsterism. From that labeling point onward, where is any kind of room for me to objectively criticize? When I made my remarks relative to my theory that yachting money, due to the Newport and Australian connections, could be a force for funding behind Zulu, you acted as if I never said the following which accompanied this theory: (I repeat) "a wild guess on my part." I mean do my qualifications for what I say count? Or do you and others, as often is the case, immediately presume that I'm point-blank stating that yachting money is behind Zulu? Have you ever shared a "wild guess" with anyone? Have you ever called it such when you did? I've done nothing less. On further research, it does seem that one of the new people hired is involved in yacht racing in the Newport vicinity. You should know, had you read my words in full, that I didn't "plant" anything. Since when is a "wild guess" the planting of something as factual? To me a wild guess is nothing but a wild guess. On your other point, I've made connections to the company and have reported them to this thread accordingly. You may recall my earlier investigative work with Tom Burgess. The original Q&A idea was a product of this work, that was articulated by Tahoeman. I've communicated with another individual also. But he chooses, given the raw treatment that the naysayer contingent provided to Burgess, to remain anonymous. No, I haven't contacted IR. There's already hundreds of people doing this. I receive private communications, on a near daily basis, from those who have, and I believe in the truthfulness and reliability of those contacts. I've emailed the new IR firm a couple of times, and at some time in the future I plan on visiting them. But what I look for is more than the 'company line,' which frequently results from investor phone calls. Donald Steinmann presented some good questions. But, you see, I've seen his answers to other people's questions. And guess what? What he gave, in response to me, were his pat answers. Notice he didn't touch the conversion question, which was the particular question. In effect, we got the common response. In closing, don't forget to let us know when you begin buying shares of Zulu. Thanks.