Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: MoneyMade who wrote (3312)	5/25/1998 10:00:00 PM
From: C Hudson	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 34075

I have been reading other threads on the internet and this stock is the buzz no doubt. There is one criticism that keeps popping up which I posted earlier, namely that there is a BIG problem with the indicated and inferred ounces with the type of sampling done which cannot show concentrations at deeper levels. The concentration of Gold is much higher closer to the surface and so to make calculations of indicated and inferred from the concentrations closer to the surface is NOT valid. The conclusion is that the proven reserves may be accurate but indicated and inferred is hype. CAN ANYONE COMMENT?

To: MoneyMade who wrote (3312)	5/25/1998 10:47:00 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Respond to of 34075

Never followed Bre-X. It went to $280? With no gold? Gee.....We have 6.4 million PROVEN and up to 150M possible. And no fraud here. These guys are Ward Cleaver all the way. Imagine the possibilities. (:->)