SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Hal Rubel who wrote (8001)5/26/1998 3:04:00 AM
From: Dwight E. Karlsen  Respond to of 74651
 
Look to market share, lack of short term and medium term alternatives. (in re strong monopoly characteristics]

I'm not so sure that is the definition of a monopoly. We are talking OS software, not necessities of life such as electrical power, oil, or telephone service. Consumers don't need computers. Therefore they are not "harmed" with a dominant and popular OS. Ironically, the very computer users that the DOJ claims is being harmed, are the same computer users who are voting for their OS of choice by buying the Microsoft Windows OS. When you think about it, the DOJ and the State AGs are being incredibly arrogant and willfully wrong-headed with their assumptions that consumers are being "harmed".

Clearly, as this case was from the beginning, it still is all about Netscape, and their inability to maintain their high-flying stock price. I wouldn't be surprised if Joel Klein has some NSCP shares tucked away for which he paid $80/share. -GG-




To: Hal Rubel who wrote (8001)5/26/1998 12:32:00 PM
From: Deliveryman  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
"Look to market share, lack of short term and medium term alternatives, and to abusive contractual arrangements to determine how behavior may be classified."

I of course completly disagree with your criteria..
If only because your use of the terms "market share", "alternatives" and "abusive" are so relative.