To: Carmine Cammarosano who wrote (634 ) 5/26/1998 11:30:00 AM From: Lazlo Pierce Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1494
Here's the whole street.com article. (you shoulda sourced your post). *********************************** Herb on TheStreet: Why Didn't CHS Electronics Tell the Whole Story About Its Earnings? By Herb Greenberg Senior Columnist 5/26/98 8:28 AM ET The Tuesday trounce: You can fool some of the people...: That's what it appears Miami-based CHS Electronics (CHSE:Nasdaq) may have been thinking when it released first-quarter earnings on May 5. CHS, whose operations are almost exclusively in Europe and Latin America, bills itself as the world's third-largest computer distributor. Not only were its profits triple the same period a year earlier, but they beat Wall Street expectations by four pennies. Four pennies! Not bad for a company that just one quarter earlier saw its stock get conked after analysts realized that the only reason its performance was so strong was because its tax rate miraculously fell to 8.7% from 29%. Then came the dazzling first quarter. The company appeared back on track, so much so that its stock started to rebound. And in an earnings press release CEO Claudio Osorio boasted: "Our performance ... shows once again that CHS is continuing to get excellent results in the area of asset management, while growing rapidly and absorbing numerous acquisitions around the world." What Osorio didn't say, and what most analysts and investors apparently failed to realize, was that the company's earnings per share weren't really what they appeared. If they had taken a look at CHS' 10-Q, filed May 19, they would've seen that the company disclosed that -- oh, and by the way -- it also had a currency transactions gain of $3.8 million in the quarter. A simple calculation shows that the gain added 6 cents to CHS' quarter; without it the company would've missed the quarter by 2 cents. Companies usually go out of their way to point out losses caused by currency transactions, because they are usually nonrecurring and don't reflect the company's ongoing business. Good ones also point out the gains. Shouldn't CHS have disclosed the currency gain along with the earnings, and by not doing so, didn't it mislead its investors? "We can't appreciate the value of that comment," a spokesman says. "Currency can go back or forth in any given quarter -- plus or minus. Investors oughta be looking in the longer term." Indeed, by taking the long view investors would see that for the second straight quarter CHS' actual operations grew at a slower rate than analysts had been expecting. And while we're comparing CHS' earnings release with its 10-Q: You can't help but wonder whether anybody noticed how several line items on its balance sheet weren't what was reported in the earnings release. "Prepaids and other current assets" actually fell by $12 million to around $100 million. The spokesman says such discrepancies are common, and merely reflect "minor reclassified items" that change as the company collects data from its far-flung operations. Some critics, however, wonder whether the changes suggest a lack of controls at CHS, which has made 26 acquisitions over the past two years, and which prides itself on a decentralized management structure. Meanwhile, last year Osorio earned $750,000 plus a bonus of more than $1 million. The bonus, in part, is tied to earnings per share. (Hmmm.) If CHS ever has trouble making its quarters, Osorio can always turn to himself. According to CHS' proxy statement, Osorio is also president of Comtrad Holdings Inc., which last year was in hock to CHS for $17.4 million. Interest charged to Comtrad last year was $684,000. But wait, there's more: Carsten Frank, a director, officer and shareholder of CHS, also serves as a director of an unidentified company that has ownership interests in other companies that do business with CHS. Last year, when CHS' sales topped $4 billion, sales to those quasi-related companies were $102.7 million. A drop in the bucket? Sure, but a drop here and a drop there and pretty soon you've got what appears to be a flood of earnings when, in reality, it's just a trickle.