Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : EDTA (was GIFT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cavior Organization who wrote (2187)	5/26/1998 12:01:00 PM
From: Al Dorsa	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2383

I never owned GIFT... but was pretty close just before the judge's opinion was rendered. Part of my DD on this stock was to correspond with a friend who is a patent attorney and agent for his input. I have forwarded many SI postings his way and FWIW, here is his reaction to the press release concerning an appeal: >Of course it is a press release full of bull****... First, it is settled law that the court is not required to hear expert testimony on the meaning of the claims. It is entirely within the judge's discretion, and it is unlikely the judge will change her mind and it is even more unlikely the appeals court will reverse her decision, and it even more unlikely the issue will get heard by the appeals court before there is a trial, as I said, unless there is a summary judgment granted against E-Data. Graham & James is fine, but the size of the law firm has little to do with the merits of the appeal. Of course E-Data is going to say everyone else still infringes. What else would they say? <