Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Arcon Energy (MIDL Presently) The Ultimate Sleeper -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave Bissett who wrote (746)	5/26/1998 1:36:00 PM
From: Ed Hoftell	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4142

NO---whats it say. Some one must really be in a jam to put out crap like that! The GAMES are truly beginning! -------ED PLEASE post their Email address

To: Dave Bissett who wrote (746)	5/26/1998 1:44:00 PM
From: Dusty	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4142

Yes, I did was yours from a dude called Norman? I did not post it but I did PM Gary. I replied as follows: Have I held the DF-144 in my hands and smelled it? No. Do I believe the new release about Exxon testing it? Yes. Dusty :o) Sounds like the doubt touters are gearing up! LOL

To: Dave Bissett who wrote (746)	5/26/1998 2:01:00 PM
From: Charger	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 4142

No, no emails yet, but the same thing happened to me on another stock. I got private email denouncing the management. When I was able to track it down, I found out that this person was a competitive company which had had some dealings with the company they were denouncing. The main company told me they were dissatisfied with the underling company's performance. It was clearly a bitter, jealousy move, to send the private emails. I also found out the person operated under 3 different names. Charger

To: Dave Bissett who wrote (746)	5/26/1998 3:18:00 PM
From: Galirayo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 4142

No email here. But Post It quick before the Close. If it's realllllly negative ..... Maybe I can get sum mor W's at at a good price. Darn, I'm begining to act like my wife when she starts buying those Beanie Baby Things. RC Disclaimer: See what happens to us old Part-Time Wrenches who remember what that Military Issue 97% Octane used to do for our Big Block Rat Motors. Anyone know where my Baby Blue 69SS Chevelle is? I'm starting to miss it now with all this info on Hi Octane. Nevermind .. got more Ws without the negative post. :))

To: Dave Bissett who wrote (746)	5/26/1998 9:08:00 PM
From: Ga Bard	Respond to of 4142

Oh yes I got it and the guy is a newbie trying to do the DD on his own and is getting no where. If Exxon was going to dispute the news release don;t you think there would have been a dispute put out by them for false information? Remember these both are reporting vcompnaies. USE COMMON SENSE when it comes to naysayers. This is the same guy that screwed up today saying Baylor University said DF-144 was a scam. I would really really not like to be this guy. The attorneys are involved and Baylor has a problem. WHo knows Baylor say the email was misunderstood and they did NOT say any such thing. They wanted more information. typical naysayer. except this poor guy does not even own the stock. What exactly his motive was I guess we shall see. Oh I talked to him and I will fax him the SGS test data I have here that I posted on the NEW Investor Post . Just taking it as it comes. GB