Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Xenolix Technologies (XTCI) 'Ecstasy'(Formerly MGAU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim Hall who wrote (1758)	5/26/1998 2:50:00 PM
From: Karl Zetmeir	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

You really have a problem with personalities, eh? So what that several of the SI participants believe in the desert dirts, got off their butts and joined the land rush. Is that a problem? Or would you have rather seen some unknowns stake the ground? Are you envious or just entralled with minutia?

To: Tim Hall who wrote (1758)	5/26/1998 2:54:00 PM
From: Richard Mazzarella	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 5143

Tim, <<histogram>> MGAU sent it out to shareholders when they announced their meeting. I hope they put it up on their webpage for all to see. What delighted me was that the histogram portrays a very different picture than their previous announcements about assay grades. The announcement suggests anything from nil to high grade ore. Of course hearing that had me thinking "yeah, it's low grade except for a hot spot". Not so, the high grade assays are the majority and form a very nice large homogenous area. The big issue of course is the ability to recover that grade economically. IMO MGAU has been more conservative than most of our dirt's. That doesn't help the stock short term, but maybe there will be another story at the end of the day?