Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Terry T. who wrote (7512)	5/26/1998 5:35:00 PM
From: aleta	Respond to of 18444

Let's hope the company really gets its act together and a__ in gear before public opinion on this hot market and sector dampens. I can support that completely.

To: Terry T. who wrote (7512)	5/26/1998 5:43:00 PM
From: CUNNINGHAM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Can someone explain what exactly today's news release means. I do not understand it. I would appreciate anyone's opinion, thank you!!!

To: Terry T. who wrote (7512)	5/26/1998 7:56:00 PM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 18444

Sorry, Terry, but I must state the following. This has been going on too long. Aleta's Comment: >>There is another way to view this picture. I think all of the speculation is just an attempt by some (not all) current investors to lure unwary investors into this stock so they can unload their shares on them leaving them holding the bag. I don't believe your side is all that altruistic either. <<< Notwithstanding your remarks, Terry, (which I appreciate) Aleta has absolutely no proof for her above comment. There's never been anything said, that I'm aware of, close to the reality of her remark. In fact, the very vast majority, if not all, of the folks who are positive on this stock remain long, and have given no hints to what she's crudely intimated. Nobody's trying to dump anything on anybody. In effect, we would prefer others join us and that they, too, go along for the ride into the future of internet online advertising and all of the electronic commerce business that Zulu is intended to accomplish. In fact, we think that we, and anyone who joins us, will make money in the process. You see, in reality, it's the daytrader crowd that's akin to the pump-and-dump that she's speaking about; not the folks who hold legitimate longterm positions in Zulu. Aleta, you're attacking the wrong bunch of good folk here. Admit it. Not only has she challenged the validity of we who've invested long, but the history of her remarks--more than not--exists on the cumulative side that's hurt our investment. And, once again, I remind her that we hold a sincere investment, not a malicious one. But when she helps to establish the highmark and it doesn't get met, whose hurt the most? Not Aleta. You see, she's got no money in the till. So why is a person with nothing to lose lending the principle voice that establishes the false benchmark? Sure she wants to buy. But doesn't everyone know she wants to buy low? Furthermore, it's inherently unfair for her to keep harping on Hayton when she has no corroborative evidence. All she has is sourced hearsay from former SIMer disgruntlement spilled into Wired, spilled into Stock Detective, spilled into Other Chap and Jon Tara, etc. What's the reality that can be corroborated? Zulu and ESVS are clearly vertically structuring several business components into one organization (and with the MYTEL registration, maybe more to come); an ESVS SEC filing clearly notates Zulu will complete the audit before this merger; current ESVS components are now being registered in the Zulu name. Plus the ticker change symbol didn't get to be named "ZULU" because the company's going to be called "ESVS." Hello!!! So what happens when time passes and the audit is delayed? Because of the false timetable, which Aleta helped establish, folks become discouraged and wind up selling. Everyone read Sririam's remarks a shot bit ago, and they were words of discouragement. How was he so influenced? What Aleta does in effect helps David Sirk's gang of price downers, not the sincerely invested. She should mark her words and give up the Hayton thing and let the company be the company and let the company set its own deadlines, and announce its growth according to how it sees fit. Should she do this, we'll all be much to the better. Maybe if it was just her alone making comments it wouldn't be so difficult. But think of the chirping birds she's aligned with when she continually dumps on Hayton as if everything that's been stated thusfar and everything that she thinks she knows is fact. It's not. When the history of this company becomes wider known, I'm certain we'll hear the background story. Until then, we must be patient.