SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LORAL -- Political Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Larry L who wrote (163)5/26/1998 5:40:00 PM
From: jlallen  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 880
 
He's thinking of a way to change the question now that it has been answered similar to the way he amended his other fallacious assertion that RR had appointed a majority of sitting federal judges. He later amended that to include only appeals court judges. It will be interesting to see how he makes this one disappear. JLA



To: Larry L who wrote (163)5/26/1998 5:58:00 PM
From: Dragonfly  Respond to of 880
 
This is a logical fallacy called the non-sequitor. Look it up.

Dragonfly


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News