Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Ask God -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alan Markoff who wrote (16533)	5/26/1998 8:37:00 PM
From: Sidney Reilly	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 39621

And you were not insulting to me from the beginning in this whole stupid thing? Yes , you were. Your very first insult was that I had had botched a chance to witness to her husband because I was cold and insensitive and secretly anti-semitic, which you have repeatedly implied. Don't deny it. You're not fooling anyone. Here are your first words on the subject from post # 16374. Are they insulting? <<At least your poor evangelical skills are consistent. I give preferential treatment to any non-believing spouse and really roll out the red carpet in humility. I find reading offensive material to someone seeking the Lord to be unwise. (I never said I was reading anything to her, you assumed it) However the Lord will persue her and her husband despite your admitted poor attempt at showing them the patience and love He has for them. Paul said he was all things to all men that he might win some, that does not give a picture of putting them down and shoving negative material at them. (Also something I did not do, you just read that into the situation from a few lines I posted to Emile.)>> YES NANCY, FROM YOUR VERY FIRST POST ON THIS SUBJECT YOU HAVE REPEATEDLY INSULTED ME. CASE CLOSED. NANCY GUILTY OF BEING THE THREAD "INSULTRESS".