To: RMF who wrote (3551 ) 5/26/1998 11:56:00 PM From: Cytotekk Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 34075
First, I have been on the IPM thread and it is one sick ward. Second, this isnt the same property the SEC is accusing them of pumping, (where have you been all this time?). That property is in California and the previous management, in addition to fending off the SEC, has filed a lawsuit against the previous owners of the property. Third, what makes you think improper methods were used to come up the 6M+ proven figure. Do you know something the rest of us dont? I have not seen the geological report or read about the exact methods used, have you? Perhaps you are privy to more information than the rest of us common mortals. Or, do you have personal relationship with Guido that you are not telling us about? Until the report is published and examined by experts, which excludes both of us, we do not know the veracity of the news release. Yes, we all have different titers, (look it up), of faith. Since I have personal knowledge of the region and its natural treasures, I have maybe more faith than most. As far as you inferring that I think I am smarter than 99% of humanity, I not only think that to be true, I know it to be true, and I have the numbers to back it up. I just hope that Guido can say the same. If I have not addressed any of your issues, I will reread your post when time permits and send private email. After I sell my first block of stock, I just may fly down to Canagalli to decide whether to sell the rest. I long to see Macchu Picchu and the Iguazu Falls again. Also, it is a tax write off. Cytotekk ps This is a highly speculative stock, do not risk what you cannot afford to loose. After the geological report is published and scrutinized, that caviat may no longer apply.