Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Stock Attack -- A Complete Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jan Robert Wolansky who wrote (8912)	5/27/1998 12:08:00 AM
From: Chris	Respond to of 42787

nite nite.. i have some studying to do too. 3 more weeks until my graduation from UCLA (undergad). can't wait.

To: Jan Robert Wolansky who wrote (8912)	5/27/1998 4:22:00 AM
From: Chris	Respond to of 42787

played around with the training mode, the labelling of wave 4 for naz doesn't mean anything.. i found out that "relabeling" the elliot waves and other "tools" are often seen.. it doesn't mean GET is not accurate.. it just simply means (to me), to follow your indicators and trading system rather trying to guess tops/bottoms via using (solely/heavily) on the GET tools (ie: elliot waves/wave count, the bias reversal, etc) in other words, the elliot wave count is great, but not as accurate as i originally thought.. looking at past history, the elliot waves looks perfect, but if you're doing training mode and looking at the last tick.. there is a lot of ambiguity on the wave count.. only after some more ticks, the program can accurately give the correct wave count. re: im testing the accuracy of this program very stringently. i figure i paid $2K. it better be accurate. and im heavily crtiical.