Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg Cummings who wrote (300)	5/27/1998 5:30:00 AM
From: 246810	Respond to of 3383

VERY OFF TOPIC Greg, There is no way I can respond to your post #268 (#reply-4576720). In my opinion, it appears to be the wild ramblings of a paranoid delusional who thinks the shorts are out to get HIM. Parts of it I don't understand, parts of it certainly can be understood by no one and parts of it are too childish to take seriously. I invite everyone to click on the above link and see for themselves. NOW, VERY ON TOPIC Besides, we are supposed to be discussing the stock and the engine's relationship to the value of the stock. So far, many besides I have asked specific questions and pointed out glaring inconsistencies that have not been answered by you. As the originator of this thread and the self appointed spokesman for the engine on SI, it is your job to dispel the anxiety in the minds of the potential investors when we technical analysts identify what we feel is a weakness in the concept or design execution. It is only in this way that you can achieve your goal of growing the stock price. Therefore, you must answer my questions regarding the engine, and I don't have to answer your questions about anything other than my qualifications to judge your engine. Since the rest of the thread has read my posts more carefully than you, they know my qualifications. I suggest you do the same, carefully. In other words, take three deep breaths, two steps back and do your job. 246810

To: Greg Cummings who wrote (300)	5/27/1998 10:13:00 AM
From: Lonnie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

Greg: This is from the co news release the other day: "Engine breakthrough? Advanced Engines Technologies Inc. says it has developed a new internal combusion engine design, dubbed the OX2, that it says produces more horsepower and fewer emissions than conventional Otto cycle and Wankel rotary engines. one key feature of the OX2 is that it has only four moving parts, vs. 67moving parts for a typical V-8 engine." And this is from your post #104: "Advanced Engine Technology holds no patents. Remember, AENG has the rights to the OX2 engine for the NAFTA countries. That is all, but that's ENORMOUS! The patents are owned by the OX2 Corp, a private corporation, which owns the worldwide rights to the OX2 engine. These rights were transferred to AENG for the NAFTA countries." And then the website that says that AENG has an approved patent but not the # yet. Could you please explain one more time to end any confusion, if there is a patent, who owns it, and if AENG only has licensing rights or not. If there is a patent in Australia, obtained by the "back yard mechanic" please have the company supply the number. Thank you. We look forward to putting an end to the patent issue! Lonnie.