Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : NetBank(NTBK)-formerly Atlanta Internet Bank -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Les White who wrote (533)	5/27/1998 10:12:00 AM
From: jjs_ynot	Respond to of 2414

Yes, I made the equivalence of deposits and earnings and revenue stream. That seems like an easy jump to make given NTBK's low cost structure.

To: Les White who wrote (533)	5/27/1998 10:23:00 AM
From: peter michaelson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2414

Regarding deposits (liabilities) vs. loans (assets), if NTBK's costs are sufficiently low, they could borrow money at 4% (SuperValue Checking) and buy adjustable-rate mortgages at 5.5%, yielding a 1.5% return on assets, assuming that the $4.50 monthly fee covers expenses. The beauty (and horror) of banking is the leverage, normally 20:1. For each $10 million of equity and subordinated capital, they can carry $200 million of mortgages and earn $3 million per year. If they can earn that 1.5% spread, after expenses, they can raise as much capital as the want, so that earnings are unlimited. This is my understanding of banking economics, not a picture of NTBK in particular. My point is that with sufficiently low expenses, NTBK need not originate loans at all. Other banks have done this with lower interest rates (checking), but higher expenses. Low costs in banking are extermely powerful, in my opinion, in these days of low customer loyalty, and the markets do not generally recognize their power. IMHO, Peter Peter