To: Paul Engel who wrote (32960 ) 5/28/1998 8:15:00 PM From: Maverick Respond to of 1570553
AMD will release a 350MHz K6-2 in Q3, 400 MHz K6-2 in Q4 98, K6-3 late 98. AMD revs up Intel rivalry with K6-2 By Lisa DiCarlo, PC Week Online 05.28.98 10:30 am ET Advanced Micro Devices Inc.'s K6-2 chip, announced today, is not only a watershed product for the company, but it also marks the beginning of a campaign to compete on more levels with Intel Corp. The K6-2, with 21 integrated 3D instructions called 3DNow, is the first nonclone processor developed by an Intel X86 competitor. Cyrix Corp. and Centaur Technology Inc. will use the 3DNow! extensions in forthcoming processors. Although AMD officials declined to name OEM partners, they said Compaq Computer Corp. and IBM Personal Computer Co. -- which already use the original K6 -- are likely candidates. Later this year, AMD (AMD) will introduce the K6-3, which is essentially the same as the K6-2 but with an on-chip Level 2 cache. That processor will compete squarely with Intel's Katmai, the code-name for a line of chips with integrated 3D instructions. However, Katmai will not hit the market until the second quarter of 1999. Dana Krelle, vice president of marketing at AMD in Sunnyvale, Calif., said this gives AMD not only a time-to-market advantage over Intel but also a price/performance advantage. Specific pricing of the K6-3 will not be disclosed until its release, but Krelle said all AMD processors will cost at least 25 percent less than comparable Intel processors. In some cases, where AMD claims its chip is faster, the price is equal. For example, AMD's 266MHz K6 costs $156 and Intel's 266MHz Celeron is $155. Celeron, which has no secondary cache, has been widely criticized for poor performance. However, Intel will plug a performance gap with the release of a 300MHz Celeron this summer, officials said. "These are bonafide alternatives to Intel processors,'' said Michael Slater, founder of MicroDesign Resources Inc. in Sebastopol, Calif. While it's true that Intel's competitors have viable alternatives in the low-cost and mid-range space, some corporate customers are still unwilling to take what they see as a risk in using a non-Intel processor. "Are they going to give me a million dollars if it breaks?" said Chuck Clabots, vice president and chief information officer at United Behavioral Health in Minnetonka, Minn., and a PC Week Corporate Partner. "That's essentially what we'd be looking for them to do.''