Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Chapman who wrote (2899)	5/27/1998 6:38:00 PM
From: JOE TURMAINE	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7491

John -- I have to caution you on one point lest we give "Janice Shell" an air of credibility that is not deserving. "Janice Shell' is not necessarily the real name of the person who posts under that name. I have heard that she is really a he and is not really in Italy. My source is NOT Bruce. JOE

To: John Chapman who wrote (2899)	5/27/1998 6:52:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

This really is enough to qualify as spamming. The hell do you think you're doing posting the same message endlessly? SI, as you should know, takes a dim view of this sort of thing. If you have something substantive to say, say it. At this point, something merely different would do. But we've all read this one quite often enough.

To: John Chapman who wrote (2899)	5/27/1998 7:14:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

NEWCOMERS CSHK has three products they are preparing to market. We shareholders think Oops. Sorry. What were we talking about?

To: John Chapman who wrote (2899)	5/27/1998 7:23:00 PM
From: CatLady	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

John, The message I am replying to is inaccurate. YOU may have inferred some of your so-called facts from my posts, but it is not an accurate characterization of what I have actually stated. I do have doubts and unanswered questions. DO NOT attribute statements to me that I have not made.

To: John Chapman who wrote (2899)	5/27/1998 11:04:00 PM
From: John Chapman	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 7491

Ver 1.11 NEWCOMERS : THE PURPOSE OF THIS POST IS TO SET OUT THE POSITIONS OF BOTH SIDES OF THIS DISCUSSION FOR YOUR READY REFERENCE CSHK has three products they are preparing to market. We shareholders think they have a lot of potential. They have no earnings at this point. They are a BB stock and do not report now. You can decide to join us in this stock or you can decide not to. I and others use our real names in posts and our e-mail addresses are posted. The other side posts that CSHK is a scam, has no products, never will have any products,the products are worthless even if they had them, its managment is incompetent, a felon is employed by CSHK, the company has employed a worthless IR firm, and a host of so many other bad things I can not keep track of them all. This side has refused to participate in fact finding with shareholders; instead preferring to do "DD" amongst themselves. Some times facts are created based on other "facts" that have no basis. Every new milestone announced by Cashco has been instantly attacked through what is called questions or DD. They are non shareholders. One of them has posted that they do not wish to be classified as on this side, but to date has not offered a summary of what his/her position is. Another has posted that the above is not his/her position, but has not responded as to what his/her position is. The best help you can get is to call the company and read the press releases at exchange2000.com IF EITHER SIDE WISHES TO RESTATE ITS POSITION: PLEASE FEEL FREE TO OFFER REVISIONS OF THIS POST