Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shashyazhi who wrote (320)	5/27/1998 8:43:00 PM
From: john griffin	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3383

Check the math!!! Your concept is correct the difference between the engines is a factor of 4. You used 4 to increase the OX2 then also decreased the 350 by a factor of 2. What is the displacement per revolution?? OX2-- 66.24 x 2(because it fires twice/rev) = 132.5 350-- only fires half each rev = 175 You said 265 & 175 ?????? To solve the rotation energy problem, could the design be changed, fix the cylinder and pistons and rotate the cam plate. Take the output off the cam plate which should not weigh much more than a standard flywheel. Would this not eliminate most of the possible problem that you are discussing. Hope this thing is for real and the price goes up--John