Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : LOCK (Saf-T-Lok) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tekktrader who wrote (667)	5/27/1998 7:01:00 PM
From: TideGlider	Respond to of 1039

Tekktrader: I remember your posts from long ago. I see you got the 666 post. Lucky you. Your posts are available. TG Here are some Subject: LOCK (Saf-T-Lok) Reply #666, Date: May 27 1998 6:14PM Tekktrader, Sorry, my mistake. After reviewing your profile, I notice that with but one exception, lock and cncx are the only threads you have posted on. You have several listed as your favorites, but not one post on any of them. Is it that......... (762 more chars) Subject: LOCK (Saf-T-Lok) Reply #609, Date: May 13 1998 6:32PM I guess Tekktrader was not very upset today. Also, I didn't know you could short a BB:OTC stock in a retail account. If someone has some information that I don't have, I would love to hear it. Phil ...................... Subject: LOCK (Saf-T-Lok) Reply #601, Date: May 12 1998 1:10PM I have to agree with Tekktrader, I believe this stock to be a pump and dump. How many of you have been to your local sporting goods store and found this product for sale? How many have seen it advertised for sale in any of the catalogs such as......... (232 more chars) Subject: LOCK (Saf-T-Lok) Reply #590, Date: May 1 1998 9:16PM TEKKTRADER If you do not own this stock why do you waste so much of your time on this thread? It looks to me as if you spend hours on this thread reading every post. I agree with 1/2 of what you say, but I can't figure out why a guy like you uses........ (65 more chars) Subject: LOCK (Saf-T-Lok) Reply #566, Date: Apr 29 1998 4:28PM Tekktrader, I won't get conned....by you. ...................... Subject: Concentric Network Corporation (CNCX) Reply #102, Date: Apr 10 1998 12:39PM Tekktrader, I missed the CNBC interview the other day. Did he come out and say that they're comfortable with earnings estimates? Everything that I've seen leads me to believe that they will meet expectations, but that is more of a hunch than a............ (477 more chars) Subject: Concentric Network Corporation (CNCX) Reply #97, Date: Apr 9 1998 6:11PM Tekktrader,stock gained 50% in three days....stock is going to take a rest for a few days. Maybe I am wrong but this stock is going to move much higher. For the time being it has been a good trading stock. (just my opinion) Take care and good luck........ (10 more chars) Subject: Concentric Network Corporation (CNCX) Reply #92, Date: Apr 8 1998 6:29PM Tekktrader,thanks much for the information.It is nice to see someone post something...still kind of a dead thread......Mike ...................... Subject: Concentric Network Corporation (CNCX) Reply #52, Date: Mar 19 1998 5:20PM Tekktrader,yesterday two big blocks. Yesterdays close bid 18 7/16 ask 18 5/8 last 18 1/8-50,000 share block. Mike ...................... Subject: LOCK (Saf-T-Lok) Reply #540, Date: Mar 19 1998 5:13PM LOL at your slanderous comments. Riley G PS. Better tell that to AVEI, and WCOM shareholders.... ----- To: Riley G (538 ) From: Tekktrader Thursday, Mar 19 1998 5:11PM EST Reply # of 540 Someone wrote me a private email saying...... (177 more chars)

To: Tekktrader who wrote (667)	5/27/1998 7:12:00 PM
From: TideGlider	Respond to of 1039

Tekktrader: I believe this may be your first post. Valentines Day <G>! To: +Ron (455 ) From: +Tekktrader Saturday, Feb 14 1998 7:11PM ET Reply # of 668 Hi. I'm new to this board, but not to LOCK. I usually stick to technology stocks, as my background is as an internet industry entrepreneur. I was surprised to find that LOCK was followed on Silicon Investor, as I was under the misimpression that SI followed only tech stocks. I found out about LOCK in just the past week in connection with a story that is being developed for a business publication about how the Internet is being used by promoters of small caps stocks to hype price and volume increases. I don't really want to get involved in a storm of controversy such as rages on the LOCK board over in Yahoo, but those of you who are interested in the facts and issues (rather than the emotional b.s. that goes on over at Yahoo) should read the SEC filings (they are a matter of public record). Also, there are published articles out there about the public relations firm that is hyping LOCK all over the net and the background of other stocks that they have promoted. While this will apparently all make interesting reading soon, those of you who hold this security might want to investigate the facts now, for obvious reasons. Thats my public service announcement for the day.