Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Zulu-tek, Inc. (ZULU) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jon Tara who wrote (7679)	5/27/1998 10:46:00 PM
From: Brady B.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

Is that what you said PartyTime?

To: Jon Tara who wrote (7679)	5/27/1998 10:47:00 PM
From: Brady B.	Respond to of 18444

I agree. I agree. I agree. bb

To: Jon Tara who wrote (7679)	5/28/1998 12:13:00 AM
From: PartyTime	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 18444

You're splitting hairs, Jon. You, no matter how you put it, you inferred that the 80/20 Zulu ownership didn't exist. You even, in trying to uphold this, presented a different part of the SEC filing where it discussed share issuance. In other words, you put out a smokescreen, a diversion. You just as easily, then, could have quoted what I quoted this morning. You didn't. And it was a good enough smokescreen that you even had me questioning whether or not I really remembered the 80/20. Thank God that BlueFox pointed out his confusion--his confusion thanks to your misdirection-- this morning, and that this led me to check for the 80/20 confirmation. As it was, this turned out to be a good thing, because Brady then followed up and confirmed what I suspected: That the actual wording on the audit release was "caused" to be completed, not to be completed. So, as a result, we got clarity in two places. If you had really meant to be helpful, you would have used your expertise to help clear these matters a long time ago. Instead, you've used them to your advantage in order to create more confusion to further your cause, which is anti-Zulu. No doubt about that. You also know that a lot of folks are inexperienced investors--as am I--and that you sound very knowledgeable. Which you are, but only for your own purpose. And your own purpose, to this date, remains undefined to the satisfaction of anyone who I know that participates on this thread. In effect, as far as Zulu is concerned, you're a wiser, more sophisticated and more effective version of Other Chap, whoever he really is. Now, if you want, I and many others, can go back and post dozens, if not more, of your negative comments regarding Zulu-tek since you've come on board this thread. It's a fact that you are--for whatever reason--against the stock, and that you'll obfuscate in any way possible to give a downward spin as to the prospects of Zulu. That, is your position. And it is the only thing that is clear about your position.