Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Chapman who wrote (2983)	5/28/1998 12:17:00 AM
From: JOE TURMAINE	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 7491

John, at one point Rhonda either posted or emailed me saying that Merced had only received one phone call from someone representing themselves as a shareholder (or maybe potential) and Rhonda said it was a man. My memory may not be what it should be, but I'm sure somewhere in these 3,000 posts janice said she phoned Merced. The story was that there was no indication of a long distance call incoming & they figured it was Florida originated. Maybe it's late & I put 2 & 2 together and came up with 4. Both of my next door neighbors are university math professors and they say you can only prove 2+2=4 "abstractly" and they always say it's a little more than 4 to be on the safe side. "safe harbour", is that what you call it?? Anyway, Jan, I did not mean it to be offensive. Just speculating out loud. You know how that is. Like Bruce maybe being Mike. OR me asking jhild if the j stood for judy and j respondind is joe short for jolene. I'm sorry, but I guess i did not have the good sense to be offended. Anyway, John I am who I say I am and everyone else can be whomever they chose to be, Goodnight! JOE

To: John Chapman who wrote (2983)	5/28/1998 10:06:00 AM
From: Janice Shell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

OOps. We have an objection from a share holder. Now I will have to revise my post again. He makes the point that perhaps Janice is not a true identity. I believe Mike Spahr addressed that issue not many posts back, but you guys seem to have memory problems. I also told you where you could check me out, but you prefer to attempt in some way to discredit me (I assume in the eyes of other readers) than to make any effort to find out more about me. Really. Is it any wonder I'm not much impressed by your recent blandishments, John? Even the most minimal attempts at civil discourse with you are eventually returned with nastiness. And by your own idiotic argument: How am I to know that "John Chapman" and "Joe Turmaine" are "true identities"? AND WHO CARES?? Let's have some answers to the questions about CSHK that you're so busily trying to draw attention away from.