Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: John Chapman who wrote (3158)	5/28/1998 2:59:00 PM
From: jhild	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 7491

Here, I have a quick question for you John, Where are Merced, Telanis, and Zitec each incorporated?

To: John Chapman who wrote (3158)	5/28/1998 3:04:00 PM
From: Bill Ulrich	Respond to of 7491

John, cut the silly word games. He doesn't appear to have any Y2K experience. It's that simple. And you would just soon have people believe he does. I'm making an educated guess that an apporximately mid-30s guy who spent the last 18 years in the automotive biz hasn't had any significant Y2K experience. I'm also guessing that the Theory of Relativity is correct, because it's underlying educated guesses are good ones. If you want to prove otherwise either about dcliff's Y2K experience or the Theory of Relativity, then feel free. And hey&#151you and Cashco were making a big deal about how the guy wasn't supposed to be contacted anyway. If you're going to insist on silly word games in favor of plain simple facts, don't bother posting to me.

To: John Chapman who wrote (3158)	5/28/1998 3:15:00 PM
From: Janice Shell	Respond to of 7491

This is what I have been trying to show your group. One should not base "facts" on DD based on personal appearances". Did you go talk to the guy? Did you even try to contact him? Do you know what his experience is? NO NO NO Yet you post things based on what "appears" to you." His experience, evidently, is "18 years in the automotive business". Really, John, this is pathetic. As I attempted to explain to you earlier, it is correct to qualify statements of which one is not 100% certain. Would that you'd saved some poor "newcomers" trouble by similarly qualifying your sadly overoptimistic estimates of near-term stock performance.