SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : XOMA. Bull or Bear? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pseudo Biologist who wrote (6386)5/28/1998 4:10:00 PM
From: Starlight  Respond to of 17367
 
PB - Thanks for the clarification. I didn't hear the entire report on CNBC, but I did hear "sepsis" and "XOMA" mentioned.



To: Pseudo Biologist who wrote (6386)6/1/1998 1:17:00 AM
From: aknahow  Respond to of 17367
 
In the real world experts say it is now, "patent or perish". XOMA certainly has an interesting portfolio of patents. Again I am impressed that this firm chose to use XOMA as an example to describe technology transfer. Pesudo, check out this site for other interesting information.

tekes.fi

Management of Technology Asset
[ TOC | Previous | Next ]

The Importance of Patent Portfolio

Patents are often considered the most important form of intellectual property, but they
only provide the frame for it. An organization also owns other knowledge property like
databases and R&D reports. Furthermore, a great deal of knowledge is embodied in
individuals who are developing the knowledge and in the organization's systems and
processes. This knowledge should also be integrated into the process of securing
intellectual property. Intellectual property rights will continue to be a global issue
impacting the operations of various organizations' business behavior in various
countries. The time effectiveness of patents will diminish, however, as product life
cycles decrease and innovation times are reduced.

An intellectual property strategy should allow the company to:

1.Continuously sell its products, especially if they are superior to
its competitors
2.Earn extra revenues from the sale of technology and/or the
license of intellectual property rights
3.Prepare for patent infringement claims

Effective intellectual property protection strategies put the technology portfolio to
maximum use, while enabling the proactive management of new technologies. This is
very important since early and active patenting is key to the development of the
intellectual property strategy. This is even more critical for technology-driven
organizations, which need procedures that ensure the immediate recognition and
protection of new, important inventions.

An organization's intellectual property strategy usually becomes more sophisticated as it
grows and gains experience. Fast-growing, technology-driven companies, however,
often grow faster than their strategic planning capability. It is important for these
companies to minimize that gap. Venture capital companies and stockholders pay
attention to the value of proprietary patent positions, and they are naturally more
interested in organizations that own the future's valuable technologies.

The cost of acquiring and maintaining patents illustrates the importance of a well-defined
intellectual property right strategy and patent budget. This is where geographical scope
comes into play. Patents should be filed in countries that are major markets for the
company's products, or where its competitors are located and manufacture their
products.

More on patenting activity can be found in the article by Kimberlie L. Cerrone and
Thomas Villeneuve ,Power to the Patents How to Maximize the Value of Your
Company's Technology Portfolio.

Additionally, the article by Richard C. Hsu What Every Biomed Start-Up Should Know
About Patents? gives a concise, profound description of what an inventor should know.
The article describes the patentability of innovations, the duration of the patent
application process, etc.

The field of intellectual property comprises patents, trademarks, copyrights and trade
secrets, all of which are intended to protect the intellectual effort of those whose creative
or scientific talents can benefit us all. Patenting and licensing of intellectual property are
key components of almost any successful marketing program, whether it is conducted
by the Federal government or by private industry. Intellectual property is intangible
property, the rights for which can be bought and sold, leased or rented, or otherwise
transferred between parties in much the same way that real estate or other personal
property can be transferred.

Various cases have been written describing scientists' success in turning their patented
discoveries into lucrative commercial deals worth several times their funding from other
sources. This funding has become increasingly crucial as federal government support for
biomedical research has decreased. Despite this increased activity, however, scientists
insist that the developing of a patentable innovation has not become a driving factor in
their research strategies. These accounts are said to be rare exceptions rather than the
rule.

A well-run laboratory cannot be built upon these kind of patent successes, even though
they provide extra funding. Instead, published research and steady grant support
remains the key to a secure future in basic science, as it has been for many decades. The
success of various patented innovations, however, has changed the axiom in
biotechnology from "publish or perish" to "patent or perish."

[ TOC | Previous | Next ]



To: Pseudo Biologist who wrote (6386)6/1/1998 10:33:00 PM
From: aknahow  Respond to of 17367
 
Any thread for discussing who's next? IMO the following are hunters: BASF, Hoechst, Bayer, H.L. Roche, Novartis, duPont, Glaxo, Smith Kline, Lilly, Pfizer & Merck. Some of the hunters might also be hunted. Hunted: AMGN, Agph,LGND, Vical, any and all of BVF holdings? Also any co in which a hunter already owns 5% or more of the shares.