Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Golden Eagle Int. (MYNG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CIMA who wrote (3749)	5/28/1998 7:21:00 PM
From: Pakman2000	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 34075

Regardless of how long it takes to mine this gold, if in fact, the find is valid.......WHICH I DEFINITELY BELIEVE IT IS, MINE will rocket based upon, not only future earnings, but the possibility of being acquired. Again downside is .25.......I'LL TAKE THE RISK!

To: CIMA who wrote (3749)	5/28/1998 8:22:00 PM
From: Mr Metals	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 34075

Hi Cima I've been sitting back and reading all these posts about MINE being a scam, etc, etc. Let me ask everybody something. This company is under a microscope with the SEC & NASDAQ. Now, do you really think they would of let MINE continue to trade if they were a scam. Also, they would of made MINE retract their NR if they had any questions/doubts regarding the content of the release. I'm long most of my holdings until proven wrong. Mr Metals

To: CIMA who wrote (3749)	5/28/1998 10:25:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Respond to of 34075

<< Terry Turner said today that U.S. standards for reserve calculations were used and a comparison to Australian standards will also be included in the report. I think this will help convince the market of the validity of the numbers in a big way. >> Well that is positive. US STandards says proven must have measurements on 25 meters centers when talking of drill holes. It will work the same way with pits or trenches. BTW, in the first geological report in April 97, Guido's sampling was don't at each 100 meters at best. I hope they went to closer sampling in the second phase. CC