SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : LORAL -- Political Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Zoltan! who wrote (308)5/28/1998 9:13:00 PM
From: peter a. pedroli  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 880
 
here is how japan opened on friday after all that took place
today in that region.

Thursday May 28, 8:46 pm Eastern Time

Tokyo stocks slip at opening on economic gloom

TOKYO, May 29 (Reuters) - Tokyo stocks slipped in early morning trade on Friday after
weakness in the Japanese economy underscored by economic indicators on Thursday prompted
sales of stock futures to buy bond futures, brokers said.

The dollar's further rally above 139 yen, as well as growing tensions in Asia, also helped to depress
Japanese stocks, they said.

At 0014 GMT, the key 225-share Nikkei average was down 164.18 points, or 1.04 percent, at
15,632.37. Nikkei June futures fell 130 points to trade at 15,630.

''Investor sentiment was watered down by the sluggishness in the economy and the situations in
Asia,'' said Kunihiro Hatae, general manager at Tokyo Securities Co Ltd.

Pakistan's decision to conduct nuclear tests has raised tensions in Asia and hit the yen. At 0037
GMT, the dollar stood at 139.08/13 yen against 137.21/26 yen in late Tokyo on Thursday.

Economic data announced on Thursday -- industrial production in April, domestic wholesale price
index for the second 10 days of May and leading economic indicators for March -- all showed that
Japan's economy was still in bad shape.

In the Japanese government bond market, the key June futures contract surged to a record high of
133.77 and the yield on the benchmark cash yen bond fell to a record low of 1.195 percent in early
morning.



To: Zoltan! who wrote (308)5/28/1998 9:40:00 PM
From: Dragonfly  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 880
 
No, you were totally, absolutely wrong about the poll tax.

Oh, really? Those who don't know history are doomed to repeat it, and you are well on your way. Prepare to be slam dunked again:

Go to this site: newdeal.feri.org
And Select: Suffrage in the South Part I: The Poll Tax or Suffrage in the South, Part II: The One Party System and then READ THEM!

To prevent you from Denying what it says, here's some relevant quotes:

From part II:
[28]TAKE THE NEGRO OUT OF POLITICS, WAS THE FIRST NECESSITY, the southern Democrats agreed. A majority of southern people, including the Populists, agreed with them. How could this be done within the framework of the fifteenth amendment? A whole set of complicated election qualifications and restrictions provided the answer. Literacy tests came first. The majority of the Negroes could be honestly eliminated in this way. But what of the approximately 33 percent of the whites who were at that time illiterate? For these the famous "grandfather clauses" were written, allowing illiterates to vote whose grandfathers had voted in the elections of 1860. Since then, the Democratic white primary, forbidding Negroes membership in the party and thus barring them from the only significant election-combined with twisted interpretations of the literacy tests, and, when necessary, frank intimidation-has deprived all but a handful of Negroes of a vote in the South.

Now you guys just call it "political correctness."

and in part I:

[32] There is one new provision in the Mississippi law that is a test of some kind of mental dexterity. To vote, one must present poll tax receipts for two years back. ... [44] There are counties and districts where Negroes are in a majority, but the white primary, manipulation of the literacy tests, and keep all but a handful of Negroes away from the polls.

and again in Part II:

[16] In North Carolina ... Under the guise of the old law, election officers permitted markers (paid by the party, or a candidate) or a single member of a household to secure, mark, and cast ballots ... to assist only physically incapables or illiterates (the state constitution calls for a literacy test for voters)

Whoosh! You been trounced. Be a man and accept it rather than changing the subject.

Dragonfly