Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ACRT going to Zero -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jean-Philippe Chevalier who wrote (106)	5/29/1998 12:41:00 AM
From: Z man	Respond to of 320

PORTANT INFORMATION REGARDING ACTRADE + AMOS! robrt60 May 12 1998 9:39AM EDT to better understand the inner workings of our little "bear raid ", here lets go back to the source. The Trustee in Bankruptcy who has filed against Amos is a man named David N. Shimron he has contracted the services of Martin J.Weis esq. who is in the employ of: Dilworth, Paxson L.L.P., 3280 The Mellon Bank Center, 1735 Market Street, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103. Now what make this VERY interesting is that Mr. Martin J. Weis esq. is working on a contingency fee basis for Mr. Shimron and we all know what that means. Lets take this a step further, with such a relatively small amount of money involved ($245,000 by Amos and $1,500,000.00 by Mr. Pink) could it be in the best interests of Mr Weis with at least the blessing of Mr. Shimron to be releasing information to some of our crims so that they might manipulate the stock to make profits on the downside for a kickback later? If so how is Mr. Pink involved, David Sheen? Daniel S. Loeb (917-226-1207), Anthony Elgindy (817- 239-8564), Third Point Securities, Keywest and some of the other crims who's names will surface soon.

To: Jean-Philippe Chevalier who wrote (106)	5/29/1998 12:47:00 AM
From: Z man	Respond to of 320

Interesting Info.... " I am writing to provide a progress report on our efforts to obtain dismissal of the Section 304 petition against you filed by Mr. Shimron. On or before March 20, 1998, we will file a motion to dismiss the section 304 petition on the basis that it is improper under the principles od United States bankruptcy law ( it has been dismissed btw ). Among other things, we believe that the Trustee's actions, in waiting more than ten years after the commnecement of the Israeli proceedings before taking actions against you in the United States ( where he has known you have been residing and struggling to start a new life ), and in unilaterally withdrawing a settlement agreement among you and your Israeli creditors, are unfair, inequitable, improper and inconsistent with the United States bankruptcy and legal principles and policies. .... For the foregoing reasons, and with the observations also set forth in our February 26, 1998 letter to you, we are highly confident that the section 304 petition will be dismissed. Section 304 petitions, which commence proceedings ancillary to foreign bankruptcy proceedings, are usually filed contremporaneously with the foreign proceedings in order to ensure that one court has the ability to administer all of the debtors assets. It is highly unusual for a Section 304 petition to be filed against a debtor, and so many years after the beginningof a foreign bankruptcy proceeding, especially where as here, the Trustee and creditors have known of your whereabouts and the possibility that you were creating asset value in the United States. The timing of the action, on the verge of the consumation of a settlement to which all your creditors consented, is highy suspect."