Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg Cummings who wrote (354)	5/29/1998 1:43:00 AM
From: 246810	Respond to of 3383

I'm glad I have been made to look like a choir boy. If you take the time to go to my profile and read my posts, you will see they are all on topic except the ones where I tried to warn you about conspiracy and insanity. Someone is correct. This thread is creating "moron" nominees. It seems to have three classes of posters: the promoters, the technicians and the investors. I consider myself in the technician class as obviously demonstrated by my posts. You can think what you want for it really doesn't matter. Enough is enough. Anyone who chooses to read the thread has enough data before them to make their own decision. I wish to thank all those who helped me to analyze the engine. Without your help the combustion dynamics would have been impossible for me to do. Counts by 2

To: Greg Cummings who wrote (354)	5/29/1998 2:06:00 AM
From: Phil(bullrider)	Respond to of 3383

To all, This post is not to be taken as derogatory, simply fact, and is public information. 1. Greg Cummings, according to his profile, had eight messages prior to 2/26/98. All to the same thread. (Not aeng) 2. Since 2/26/98 he has had 11 messages not related to aeng. Nine of those were to HIV, his previous thread of choice. Two were to two different NDS threads, but were the same message. One other message was posted on the OE thread the day he began this thread. This is all public information for all to see by clicking on his name. Just information, nothing personal, Greg, since I have already nominated you to the Moron thread for your personal attacks. Phil

To: Greg Cummings who wrote (354)	5/29/1998 4:54:00 AM
From: wonk	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 3383

Greg: A few questions and comments. From your post #283 As I've said before, Carroll Shelby is 100% behind AENG. Not 99%, but 100%. Carroll Shelby lives and breathes AENG. Carroll is probably the only one talking more about AENG than AENG themselves. The implication here is that you have talked with him personally. Otherwise, how could you make such a statement without that conversation? Yet in your post #299 reprinting the "e-mail" from Mr. Travis: ...Greg, you can print all or portions of this. I ask that you eliminate the email address. I am also making arrangements so that you can speak directly with Mr. Shelby to hear and report back the truth. Something that _____ hasn't a clue about, the truth that is. See you all in the market tomorrow. Regards, David Travis President ******END******* I love this! If you'd like to pass along a few questions for Mr. Shelby, I'll be happy to ask. The intimation here is that you will pass questions to Mr. Travis to be answered by Mr. Shelby. What need is there to pass questions since you seem to know Mr. Shelby so intimately? ...Carroll Shelby lives and breathes AENG. Carroll is probably the only one talking more about AENG than AENG themselves.... [repeated for emphasis] From your post 257 All, There's a rumor going around that someone who's shorting AENG paid a flunky reporter to write a negative story about the company. I don't know if it's coming, it's just a rumor. If it arrives, I want everyone to be prepared. Where did you here this rumor? In your post 247 PS. I apologize for the misinformation in post #104. Let me assure you that it was totally unintentional and simply an attempt to further the knowledge base of this board. I hate spreading inaccurate information, but I did it and I was wrong. Again, I apologize. Here is what you wrote in 104 The visit to the University of Wisconsin at Madison is much more involved than originally reported. AENG is not only going to have its gauges checked, but the Engine Research Center at the University of Wisconsin will thoroughly test the engine and certify the results. This is a highly respected research facility. They will test fuel consumption, emissions, horsepower, foot pound torque, etc, all at varying rpm. Please tell us who gave you this inaccurate information so that they can be held accountable. In 231 Sword asked But in regards to investment in the company, Buckfa is very wise in recommending we find out when the company held shares can be traded. This is an immense block and could drive the price into the single digits if unloaded all at once. Have you made any progress in finding this out, Buckfa? And is there anyone else who might be able to help in this? With such wonderful "inside sources" why couldn't you help on this? In your post 195, ALL, A little birdie just sat on my window sill and said .................................... "News tomorrow on AENG" and then he flew away. Darn bird, I wanted to ask him what it was about, but he was gone. Who told you the Detroit Press was going to publish the next day? In post 116 The two directors of AENG are: Murray Bailey (the CEO) and George Hunt (not of silver fame). I have the bio on Mr. Hunt somewhere, but I can't locate it at the moment. I'll post as soon as it's found (it's got to be in one of the piles on my desk):-) Since you never posted it, I assume your desk is very messy. From post 29 I came across something very interesting today and thought I'd share it with you guys. It's an e-mail sent to others who attended the meeting with AENG, from one of the higher ups at TACOM Military facility (listed on AENG's web site as "US Army Tank-Automotive & Armaments Command"). I thought about reproducing this word for word, but since this is e-mail sent to someone else, I won't. I'll just give you the basics of the e-mail. Who sent you this and why? Finally in your post 14 Also, I've been an investor for many years and have developed many relationships along the way. Yet in post 265 Yes, I'm still attempting to grow-up. It's difficult, but I'm trying! My five year high school reunion is coming up in a few years and I hope I'm ready. Which one is it? Actually, I'm leaning towards the latter explanation since you did not know that Auric Goldfinger is the famous villain from probably the best James Bond movie (and arguably the best book.) Bond: Do you expect me to talk? Goldfinger: No Mr. Bond, I expect you to die. ww

To: Greg Cummings who wrote (354)	5/30/1998 2:45:00 PM
From: Don Pueblo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 3383

Well Greg, I'm done. I must say that this high-school denigration of Goldfinger is a serious kink in your armor. Here are a few questions. We have, it appears, messages relayed by you from Carroll Shelby and Bob Teague. Perhaps they would be willing to confirm these messages via a disinterested third party? My e-mail is on my profile. I know all about what Goldfinger has said in his posts. Your admonishment is ill-placed, and this is a huge red flag, IMHO. If you are sure you have a winner, and so sure Goldie controls the market, why not let Goldie drive the stock down to about 5 bucks and load up your truck with more shares? What's the big deal? The insider selling is worrisome, is it not? Extremely worrisome. What do you have to say about it? Can someone see an actual motor at some point? Please? That would be a real positive step. A patent app would be good too. Now, I know what you are thinking; I am a "mole" or some other kind of evil bastard that has lots of ulterior motives for questioning you and your BB stock that has no financials and more red flags than the circus. I have never heard of Goldfinger until recently but I tell you I can't find much wrong with his posts. I am very interested in this motor if it actually exists. 130 cubes and the same HP as a small block Chevy is an interesting idea. It is possible I could buy this stock under certain circumstances. I think you protest about the questioning of red flags so much that you might be on somebody's payroll yourself! (It goes both ways, you see.) So what do you say? Do you want to start a flame war (you'll lose, I am the MASTER) or do you want to answer the questions? TLC :>