Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : Harvard Scientific (HVSF)Hot$$- male impotency medicine -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sidney Merle Foster who wrote (3574)	5/29/1998 10:31:00 AM
From: Dan Dieffenwierth	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3906

Sid, I thought the purpose of the reverse split was to raise the share price and lower the number of share's so they could attract more favorable financing as well as be more attractive to a partner or purchaser. Now they want to increase the number of share's again. In a way almost defeating the purpose of the reverse. They mention there aren't enough share's to do a 2 for 1 split, but it looks like a simple math problem for comparison and nothing indicative of it actually happening. Could this maybe have something to do with getting their market capitalization up over 50 mil., one of the qualifiers for a NMS listing? If so why don't they just say so. Just some thoughts. IMO. Dan