Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Advanced Engine Technologies (AENG) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brent who wrote (368)	5/29/1998 4:29:00 PM
From: articlight	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 3383

To all AENG folks....................... Stock holder and long time lurker also......It seems to me we are allowing ourselves to get lost in the heat of things here. I'm sort of an old timer I guess and somewhat of a motor-head and can talk moments of enertia, air mass velocity, flame front travel, dwell angles and duration and the classic ICE work cycle and on and on and on.......But for the average investor here is this the best approach? Nor is it productive to engage in the raging FINGER fight.....I think not. I bought this stock because I believe Mr. Shelby is not a fool, the engine is very light weight considering it's power output, it does not have a power robbing valve train and complexity, its' fuel diversity, its' low operating temperature, its' fuel economy, very few moving parts and thus giving over all simplicity and ease of manufacture. In closing, I'm comfortable with what I see with this engine concept and will continue to hold the stock...........what the Wall Street bankers and market makers do is indeed "beyond my poor power to add or detract." May your trading be profitable............Your Friend

To: Brent who wrote (368)	5/29/1998 7:45:00 PM
From: Greg Cummings	Respond to of 3383

Brent, I agree with your statement, "I don't think you should 'believe' either side. Look at the information in front of you and decide for yourself. Don't rely on Greg, Goldfinger, me or anyone else." Very well said! Regarding the NY Observer article. This is exactly the article referred to in post #257. Just so you know, the NY Observer isn't the NY Times. Try to find someone in NY who's heard of this paper. I've talked to numerous NY City dwellers today.........I can't locate one who has heard of the NY Observer. The Observer is probably some little, back alley newspaper hiring reporters who can't find real jobs. Why didn't they make a call to Shelby's office if they wanted an experts opinion? Why didn't they mention Unique Mobility? They specifically avoided anything positive about the engine. This is typical flea bag, tabloid journalism. This doesn't resemble reporting, this is one sided story telling. It's TOTALLY WORTHLESS!! Best of Luck, Greg Arctic, I appreciate your words of wisdom and I'll try........