Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : ICVI (now MTEI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: BILL L who wrote (4699)	5/29/1998 3:56:00 PM
From: Maakamil	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 11850

Regarding the dissenting view: Thanks for all the responses to my friend's email. A couple of qualifiers: My friend is not invested in ICVI/ME. He was just responding to my request for an unbiased opinion. Thus his analysis is just surface level, consisting primarily of preliminary impressions--it was by no means substantiated DD work. Second, I am invested in ICVI, and have not sold a share. I did more DD on the Rocketmen than I did on ICVI, and I liked what I saw over the progression of their posts on DGIV. Hence here I sit with my 135,000 shares. At this point, I trust that they have a clear handle on what is about to make this company stand out from the pack. But I do want to add one point. A book value of $2.85/share is not such a big deal is it? For a comparision--look at Cotton Valley Resources (AMEX: KTN). The last time I checked, they had a book value (I think that would be proven reserves) of something like $6 or $7 per share, but the share price has been languishing a little over $1 for months now. If I am in error here, please help me out, oil guys! It's just that the book value does not automatically mean that the stock will automatically rocket (no pun intended) up to that price. Maakamil