SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kok Chen who wrote (34016)5/29/1998 4:20:00 PM
From: DJBEINO  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 53903
 
Micron Reportedly Interested In TI's Twinstar Fab

pubs.cmpnet.com



To: Kok Chen who wrote (34016)5/29/1998 4:32:00 PM
From: DavidG  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
Kok,

Well...maybe you are right I don't have the ability to prove or disprove your unusual assertion. I was only able to check back 3 months on Telescan chart and MU didn't put in any dojis during that time....just mostly red candles.<vbg>...maybe Pat can check that out, he is the keeper of ALL MU data.<g>

In general a doji preceded by a red candle signifies a bottom and a high probability of white candle to follow.

...red candle again...SOXX sold off at end dropping below 260 and down 3% but MU down only 1%. Don't know when the white candle or doji will occur, but when it does I would venture to guess the bears will run for cover in droves.:-)

I think the specialists and Market makers were nervous about a nuclear holocaust over the weekend.<g> Especially with the advanced technology of India and Pakistan.<ggg>

Good Luck Trading

DavidG




To: Kok Chen who wrote (34016)5/29/1998 4:41:00 PM
From: TREND1  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 53903
 
kok
Now if I held MU since 1988, I would not like MU=4 either.
By the way...if you read the fine print on the chart....
I AM NOT PREDICTING MU AT 4 !!!! as some om this BB have stated.
I am showing a TA formation....and state that there is no
probabilities connected with "classic TA"....
Larry Dudash
PS: I use PTA