Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : TSIS: WHAT IS GOING ON? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dave Gore who wrote (2392)	5/29/1998 10:06:00 PM
From: BarbaraT	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6931

R. Gates ... I cannot believe the company would intentionally keep the price of the stock down. I happen to know they are just as exasperated as we are. But I also know that what you are hinting at is stock manipulation... and that is most definitely not legal. Whether it be market makers, shorters, or the whim of the market that is keeping the price down, I do not know. But I do know, as you do, that the direction is up. After enough news filters out, the financials come out, and revenues increase quarter to quarter ... the final outcome will be a stock price that more accurately reflects its worth. Its a tough road to climb, but we will all be glad we had our hiking boots on!

To: Dave Gore who wrote (2392)	5/29/1998 11:27:00 PM
From: R. Gates	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6931

Dave, Just for my education (really), how are you so sure that MM's won't control the price of a stock within certain bounds for a company? Aren't there such a thing as "friendly MM's"? Why would it be unreasonable to think that MM's might be tight on raising the ask for a stock if they wanted to keep it from going up too fast... It really seems like you have some knowledge of this dynamics, and I would like to understand it better than I thought I had. I will gladly state on the thread a complete retraction of my assertions if you can fill me in on your knowledge of MM/Company dynamics. (especially in regards to BB's) I really thought my analysis WAS PLAUSABLE! For many different reasons. Looking forward to your reply! R. Gates