Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Micron Only Forum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TREND1 who wrote (34047)	5/30/1998 1:29:00 PM
From: Kathleen capps	Respond to of 53903

Larry, Are you sure you don't work for MU's PR department???? ;-) Kathleen

To: TREND1 who wrote (34047)	5/30/1998 2:07:00 PM
From: John Graybill	Respond to of 53903

>>(Twinstar) comments? I made all mine a month ago when this came up the first time. Ain't gonna help Micron even if it happens, and I think it won't. Remember that they floated the CPQ/MUEI buyout rumor two option cycles in a row as well. I guess this was a rush job because of INTC's "Merced will be late" bomb. I was expecting an explicit tout from Burlap the beginning of this month, not a nudge-and-wink, "no comment"-laden teaser. So the only question for loading the boat on Monday is whether Big Money drops it to 22 in the first 10 minutes on a panic open, and tells Maria B to blame INTC, and then shoot it up to 26 or so over the next few days as "the Twinstar story starts to gain momentum", or whether they jack it around a while and collect some option premium on the June 20 calls before pulling the plug. If you put your thumb over last July's run to 60, and connect the "real" highs since then, you will see a great opportunity this week for Them to jack it up on nothing whatsoever.

To: TREND1 who wrote (34047)	5/30/1998 9:14:00 PM
From: Skeeter Bug	Respond to of 53903

>>In fact it is the low cost producer.<< larry, you appear to have a big sucker strapped to your head ;-) many asian countries are selling above gross cost right now - per the doc. mu isn't. how can they be the low cost producer? i know it is a leap of sidewalk crack proportions. ;-) you put far too much trust in those that beat you, as a small investor, very, very badly. every now and then i think this is the s&m thread. tell me lies... beat me, beat me... tell me more lies ;-)

To: TREND1 who wrote (34047)	5/30/1998 10:02:00 PM
From: pat pasquale	Respond to of 53903

LD; your dreaming and fishing for an answer, and no way does TXN finance anything in the DRAM business. why spend good money after bad..they were smart enough to get out of this money losing business so why should they go back in..let alone with a outift like MU who has no other means of making money....DRAMs are NOT and will NOT be profitable for a long time if ever again...BTW didn't you say that the MERCED INTC chip needed more memory to run...now what? Why are you still digging down deep and trying to find a way for MU to go up...this pig will sink....get off the dream it aint happening and cut your loses... Oh I know you have no positions until the stock has a small pop and then you were playing that move...sorry i forgot... good trading pp