Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : India Coffee House -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Senor VS who wrote (1152)	5/30/1998 4:41:00 PM
From: Rational	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 12475

Ravi, Mohan, JPR and David, in particular: Any comments? This is from WSJ (5/30/98): The architect of Pakistan's nuclear program, Abdul Qadeer Khan, was quoted Saturday in the English-language newspaper, The News, as saying that Pakistan's nuclear weapons program is more sophisticated than India's. "I would say that they have used the old technology of plutonium from spent fuel, whereas we have used enriched uranium, which is much more sophisticated and a safer process," Mr. Khan was quoted as saying.

To: Senor VS who wrote (1152)	5/30/1998 11:25:00 PM
From: JPR	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 12475

<< Lorena Bobbitt to be India's Family Planning Chairman or some top position to keep Indian population under control :=).. >> Consider the intricate spreads, turnarounds, folds, tucks, & knots of LONGOTTA: Each geographic region in INDIA has its own version of LONGOTTA . No one person can become an expert at undoing the spreads, turnarounds, folds, tucks, and knots of a complicated LONGOTTA to get to the LINGUM. Your suggestion is a Good cutting edge technology, but very impractical because of the complex LONGOTTA. The Indian probably knows in his mind that a complex LONGOTTA is LINGUM saver. It is as complex as the protein folds. JPR