Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : FRANKLIN TELECOM (FTEL) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (34326)	6/1/1998 7:43:00 PM
From: Stephen B. Temple	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 41046

I wonder if anyone would like to toss this question around for a latency test> As we know, IP video,data,voice require low latency backbones. Since FNet Corp. is run through WCOM, would it make a difference if> " the packet originates on A backbone (WorldComm in this case) and travels on A backbone WCOM to the destination IP telephony site?" Don't forget that some gateways will use A backbone and run through B backbone (whomever B is) to the destination site, and this will make a difference in latency. I know the answer isn't easy, but tests show that using A backbone from start to finish does make a difference. Since WCOM has its own backbones, the IP packet shouldn't need to run through MAE East, therefore less latency will occur. Why else would Frank want his "tempest-gateway" to run on its own virtual-track. Choo! Choo! Anyone agree to disagree? sTempy