SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : AMD:News, Press Releases and Information Only! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (6430)5/31/1998 11:52:00 PM
From: Yousef  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 6843
 
Pravin,

Re: "AMD will be able to do at least 350 Mhz with their 0.25u process ... so it
appears that AMD's 0.25u process is at least 50 Mhz better than Intel's 0.35u process."

First Pravin, AMD has not released the 350mhz K6-2 version ... in fact, the
333mhz part is hard to find. So the question to you, Pravin --> is the AMD
.25um process closer in performance (speed) to Intel's .25um or .35um process ??
Please try to answer this "truthfully" ... I know the answer is hard for you
to admit. <ggg>

Make It So,
Yousef



To: Pravin Kamdar who wrote (6430)6/1/1998 1:56:00 AM
From: Kenith Lee  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 6843
 
Pravin,

DEC gets over 400mhz with 0.35um process. Alpha would be much faster with better process technologies which neither DEC nor Samsung have.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News