SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Compaq -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Greg Jung who wrote (26884)5/31/1998 10:42:00 PM
From: Eddie Kim  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Where have you heard that Compaq has scrapped DEC's entire PC division?

-------------------------------------------------

Channel Assembly, BTO Will Heat Up:
techweb.com



To: Greg Jung who wrote (26884)5/31/1998 10:47:00 PM
From: gao seng  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 97611
 
I orignally thought Compaq was going to be punished by Intel when they announced that Compaq would sell AMD cpus in their PCs several months ago, and was delighted to see my prediction come true by seeing their stock price take a beating. However, the move seems brilliant in light of recent news from Intel regarding Merced. Compaq's current inventory problems revolve around obsolete pentiums, not AMD or Cyrix machines. So by removing themselves from the umbilical cord of Intel, they are also free of Intel's problems, which now seem to be huge. Trust me on this, Microsoft will not delay NT enterprise assimiliation because of this. But there option is Compaq via the Alpha chip to compete with Ultra Sparc. Alpha is already 64 bit and scales quite nicely, whereas the Merced is still a pipedream of Intel, a company that has a reputation for quality manufacturing, but flawed processor designs (i.e. floating point errors). The future is no longer WinTel but WinPaq, and to complete the picture, I look for Compaq to acquire Fore Systems because it is a well known fact that Microsft has bet the farm on a internet based on a minimum of 2MB per second bandwidth through ATM. This is documented in their Netshow documentation, and supported by the fact that Microsoft is being transformed into an entirely Fore ATM network. I think Compaq sells crappy PCs to the home user, but are far superior in the business end. This is their problem, and the solution is not Radio Shack, but Wal-Mart who has virtually no PC sales at their stores. They got badly burned by 486's becomin worthless overnight. The first, either Dell or Compaq or whoever, to get the Wal Mart connection will win the home user market. I believe this will be Dell, the logistics of each match so well. But Compaq doesn't need this market, and should concentrate on the business market selling NT Alpha machines. Disaccociation from Intel is one thing, but selling junk AMD's can hurt your reputation in the long run.



To: Greg Jung who wrote (26884)5/31/1998 11:09:00 PM
From: rudedog  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
Greg -
According to Jerry Meerkatz, who I believe is the VP and general manager of CPQ's portables division, the hinote line will be strongly supported and enhanced after the merger. This was a part of an internal 'state of the merger' newsletter that apparantly now comes out every week or so at CPQ.



To: Greg Jung who wrote (26884)6/1/1998 11:00:00 AM
From: Jason Hall  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 97611
 
The merger hasn't closed yet. DEC shareholders vote on June 1(3?)th.


<!--I'm afraid egotism has gotten the better of CPQ here,
they gutted the DEC PC division, didn't they? Including (and
most regrettably) the portables. Insert correction if not,
notwithstanding the recent commercials. DEC's laptops may
be too highbrow for Compaq.

Greg-->



To: Greg Jung who wrote (26884)6/1/1998 3:46:00 PM
From: John Koligman  Respond to of 97611
 
Greg,
I don't think too many of us on the outside really know what they are going to do with the DEC PC piece of the business. I'm only commenting on what I see productwise today. So, what I see is that CPQ does not have the thin/wide form factor that DEC does, and it would make sense to me that they would capitalize on product DEC already has in production that does not overlap with CPQ product. I could certainly see CPQ chopping the Intel PC desktop business, but not parts of DEC's laptop line....

John