Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : MSFT Internet Explorer vs. NSCP Navigator -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (19845)	6/1/1998 1:09:00 PM
From: The Vinman	Respond to of 24154

NSCP announces the re-design of its' web page to attract new users. May look like good news but to me it looks like desperation. This company is a full blown web portal and nothing else. I still believe in a stock price of less than $10 in the next 2 years, but the near term is calling for a move back to the teens, where it will hold up until the next earnings announcement which of course will be terrible..... Vinman

To: Daniel Schuh who wrote (19845)	6/1/1998 1:28:00 PM
From: Daniel Schuh	Respond to of 24154

Oops, I picked the wrong current example to compare and contrast. The correct current example is <This being the same legal branch that held the DoJ, the top cops in the land, had investigated Microsoft and found them "not a monopoly".> You seem to be fond of posting this. Perhaps you disagree with it. Of course taken in context it would read that MSFT has never been found to be an illelgal monopoly by our court system. If this is not true, let us know. (post 19841) compared to the historical Dan, all of that typing and you have said nothing. MSFT has set no precedent, hih? So I assume that the decision handed down by the Justice department on per processeor deals, OS bundling and online networks must simply be in my imagination. If not, what does it mean. The JD has already rendered a decision on MSFT. Their decision is an interpretation of the law, by the top cops in the country. Their decision apparently states that MSFT is currently, and has not historically been in no major violation of anti-trust policies as currently interpreted by our nations honorable adjudication system (sans the decree issued, of course). If you don't like it, fine. If you don't agree with thier decision, that is fine as well, but stop pretending that it didn't happen. If it happened, it can be considered precedent. (post 12961 here, quoted in full) Well hysterical might be more appropriate than historical, but you got to read it in context. The correct context being the Mind of Reg(TM), where the former quote has some logical relation to the latter. A frightening context indeed. Cheers, Dan.