Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Father Terrence who wrote (22679)	6/1/1998 2:56:00 PM
From: Jacques Chitte	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Yes. It is, after all, a law. The point is - if it's a bad law, we should influence the legislative apparatus as it exists to change it. If you as an individual elect to ignore a law you find bad, that makes you an outlaw. Civil disobedient, perhaps, but you know the drill.

To: Father Terrence who wrote (22679)	6/1/1998 4:52:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

A law is by definition legal, as it is "deriving authority from, or founded on law", so long as a law has been properly passed, and has further been upheld by the courts a law is legal. You don't like laws that don't mesh with your Randyness. I don't like laws that don't mesh with my concept of the universe either. But the fact that you or I don't like a law doesn't make it illegal. And your concept of "objective" only means "that which Terrnce Bergh thinks is objective"- not exactly solid ground, imo.