Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : CSHK CASHCO MANAGEMENT Y2K -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: CASHCO who wrote (3638)	6/2/1998 8:54:00 AM
From: John Chapman	Respond to of 7491

From today's Stocks for Tommorrow newsletter "I am hearing that the first order on the Company's Year 2000 diagnostic software will be out soon. That should help turn around the price of the stock. There have been 3 news releases recently, and with additional news momentum should turn positive.With the negative price action of late we tend to forget that the stock has had two runs at $1.00 since or first recommendation."

To: CASHCO who wrote (3638)	6/2/1998 10:39:00 AM
From: jhild	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 7491

OPEN LETTER TO RHONDA WINDSOR: I received your Private Message (PM) to me this morning, but you should know that my position is to conduct this inquiry for all to see, in an evenhanded way. So let me reproduce this message and respond to the points that you raise. To: jhild From: CASHCO Tuesday, Jun 2 1998 4:00AM ET Tell you what let's make a deal. You tell me who you are and what your associations are with certain people and I'll fill in the blanks. Until then, you get nothing. Shareholders have and will... but someone who has to hide behind an alias and who will not disclosure the true nature of his or her's agenda and who is not a shareholder is, in my opinion, entitled to nothing. You want to know who I am. Well I say that given the current climate of harassing emails and even attempted in person visits by the more avid of your supporters on the Yahoo, that my precise identity is really not relevant. There has been the often asked question of my involvement with some of your past associates or yourself. I can answer that categorically that there has been none. I had never heard of your particulars, or the particulars of your past companies, until my very first post on this thread, post #800. That was back on just April 25th. When I posted, I happened on a thread that was dominated by yeahsayers and touts, where any inquiry was shouted down and attributed to sinister agendas. The more questions I have asked, the less I have seen answered. Well, I am a little stubborn, and when people don't answer questions from where I come from, it's because they have something to hide. The blanks, as you call them, is information that should be made freely available to everyone, not just shareholders. I am not looking for special attention or treatment. I just want to see the information made available. For the life of me, I cannot understand why you would need to know who I am in order to answer what states the Merced, Telanis and Zitec companies, mentioned in your recent Press Releases, are each incorporated in. You may be sure, that I will continue to ask this question until answered, just as you may be sure that I will ask other questions as they arise, until I am sure that enough of the truth, whatever it is, is out for all to see. My agenda is unrestrained access to the truth for everyone equally.