Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: paulbk who wrote (5363)	6/2/1998 2:02:00 PM
From: K A Anderson	Read Replies (5) \| Respond to of 6654

Paul this was posted on the AOL boards,,, did you realize we are just a bunch of novices? Just read this piece of garbage... IMO But Pat Charles has an AOL account!! Maybe he doesnt like us messing up his big time business... KAA > ************aol crosspost*********** > Subject: Re: Their math stinks Date: Fri, May 29, 1998 11:19 > EDT From: Profeta987 > The legal twist of which you speak is about as ridiculous as > the typical big talk about what "Me and my lawyer are going to > do you in court" that most inexperienced little people pump talk > to themselves when they are upset with something that someone did > to them. You and the other novices on the SI board have no idea of > what your legal position towards the management of this or any corporation > is. No idea of the legal costs involved to even bring a suit stating > that position into being. No idea of the effort and paper work involved > to keep a suit going month after month after month. No idea of the > of how long it could potentialy take to get any kind of a decision, > favorable or not. No idea that even if you could in your wildest dreams > ever get a judge to rule in your favor, that by that time, there would > be nothing, nothing, nothing left to distribute to the shareholders. > Wake up, get into the real world, everybody would lose in a legal > action. Jack, whether you like it or not is calling the shots and > there is zilch you or anyone can do about it. My advice is get with > what he's trying to do and forget about your petty little grievances.

To: paulbk who wrote (5363)	6/2/1998 2:16:00 PM
From: campe	Respond to of 6654

Paul, you have have brought up some very valid point. I am beginning to doubt that there are any oil and tire businesses "waiting on the sidelines" to be acquired. I would find it hard to believe that some of them O & T business owners haven't found their way onto SI yet. In fact, are there any Oil and Tire Business owners out there in cyberland that have contacted or have been contacted by WOTD for the sake of being acquired? Does anyone know of any? If so e-mail me (camp_e@hotmail.com) or post here. So far, the only info we have is coming from Jack Arnold. As stated in a previous post, I too believe that Jack is being manipulated like a puppet. IMO, he is being told what to do, what to say, and how to say it via Press Releases. No public company has ever been successful by promoting a policy of secrecy and info blackouts like what we've been getting about the industry experts, WOTD principals, and details of this alleged merger. They've been promising all sorts of "details" and merger completion for 6 months now. What's the real story?