Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Tri-Vision & The V-Chip -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: D.E. Shetland who wrote (2953)	6/2/1998 11:40:00 PM
From: trenzich	Respond to of 5743

DES your responses are embarrassing. You claim to be a high priced analyst. maybe, but i still say you can't read and understand these statements. But riddle me this, why are you trying to analyze ACRI, are you short (if you are, well ok, can you tell the truth). The questions I raised was about TVL and the credibility of its management. So far no one on this thread has challenged my points including you mr. analyst or their paid mouthpiece, JC. Why is that? I'll give you another chance, want to take it, ANYONE? Now back to you DES Your right about hiring PW now. But all past financials were compiled by Mr. F. We'll see what PW says once they've had a good look at the finances at the end of the year. No DES, Price Waterhouse audited their financial statements for the year ended 12/31/97 and they got a clean opinion and my 16 year old son knows what that means. Why don't you take your analysis to your boss and i bet you won't have a job for very long. ACRI is now in the big time so they have big time accountants. You're upset because TVL with a market cap of 100,000,000 is still using a small local firm. Your comparsion did not work. Admit your mistake. This is simple, if you can't this right, you have no credibility at all. and what was this Sounds like a "going concern" phrase to me. Good thing their accounts are the well known firm of Finocchiaro & Co. Who the heck are they?Oh, I see. Fred Finocchiaro, the accountant that passed on everything, is also a happy shareholder (69,000) shares and also was paid in warrants. How nice. As stated above PW gave them a clean opinion. Good analysis (wrong again) and where did you get the info that Fred Finocchiaro obtained shares when he was the auditor. Show us the proof, because if you had some, i would be interested because that would be illegal, independant accountants can't do that in this country. So put up or apologize. You're a professional, try acting like one Once again, why are all those who are closest to the company selling shares, cashing out personally, if the future is so bright? Perhaps they know a good thing when they see it. Good analysis, wrong again. As has been said before NO insider has sold anything, other than 2 Soundview holders who sold a portion of their shares this year mainly for tax purposes. Name any others mr. analyst. Before you do you, you better take a course on what an S3 filing is, before you put your foot into one more time. Let me sum it up, your analysis sucks, you don't know what you are talking about. Is ACRI still unproven and a risky investment, absolutely but the future reward is also there. Mr Market speaks. But you don't own any ACRI so don't worry about my risks. However you own TVL big time and i have shorted it. I have given you my reasons, and the main one is the credibility of TVL's management (like your analytical skills). You know TVL better than ACRI so answer the questions i have raised,(and i would be willing to reconsider) but you won't. Here they are again. To: John Carswell (2829 ) From: trenzich Friday, May 29 1998 7:34AM ET Reply # of 2961 JC, are we going to get that conference call? btw, still waiting answers on old questions As to your responses let's review them. 1."the statement you referred to was clarified at the 1997 AGM by the meeting Chairman and Tri-Vision's President & CEO to ensure that there was no misrepresentation made or construed and that shareholders were clear on the meaning of the statement." So what you are saying is the statement in the annual report was misleading, or best confusing. So can you explain how he clarified it at the AGM. What did he say? How many people were at the annual meeting? Why did they not clarify to the thousands of shareholders who weren't at the meeting. Here's his chance! 2. Are you stating that the Company will get a clean opinion from the Accountants if the company continues to value the rights at 10+ million. What is the name of the accounting firm doing this? Why aren't you using a big six firm? And how can they value the rights based on contingent stock that may not be issued. And when will you start writing off these costs and over what period of time? 3. On the subject of insider trading, will you please tell us how much insider selling occurred in the months of Sept-Dec /97 and Jan-March 98,and at what prices. Also tell us how much attending the CES show cost? Are you saying the company had no funds on their own to go to the show. I'll draw no assumptions of this until you reply (how much time will you need) 4. Why is the company buying a building from the insiders? looking forward to your prompt response tz