Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Waiting for the big Kahuna -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Monty Lenard who wrote (19651)	6/2/1998 9:47:00 PM
From: ratan lal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

Monty - do you have the formula for calculating the next number in a series of numbers based on the info you have provided. ANYONE - ratan

To: Monty Lenard who wrote (19651)	6/2/1998 9:50:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 94695

<< 30 Days ago 415 were above the 200 DMA(83.0%) 20 Days ago 387 were above the 200 DMA(77.4%) 15 Days ago 378 were above the 200 DMA(75.6%) 10 Days ago 375 were above the 200 DMA(75.0%) 5 Days ago 362 were above the 200 DMA(72.4%) 6/1/98 341 were above the 200 DMA (68.2%) 6/2/98 331 were above the 200 DMA (66.2%)>> Monty, can you get that number for January 9th 98. That is the most recent day when the S&P closed below its 200 DMA

To: Monty Lenard who wrote (19651)	6/2/1998 10:21:00 PM
From: James F. Hopkins	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 94695

Monty; That makes sence to across the board quick paste NY AME NAZ OTC New Highs 57 8 52 66 New Lows 95 34 203 45 only the OTC had more new highs than lows while the NAZ was up today you know with 52 to 203 it was not on any real strenth..just a few nich players that popped the index. This is my kind of TA..things are relitive, and indexes can lie, you have to compare and look at internals, to get away from the foam and froth and knee jerk stuff. Jim