Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Crystallex (KRY) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Carl who wrote (8758)	6/3/1998 1:58:00 AM
From: E. Charters	Respond to of 10836

Whoah Nelly! So I am "a little too cocky"? Well, well, well. My sources are not just Roy Carson. My experience with Dome Mines goes back 25 years. My analysis of this story began with a lot of in depth interviews with the Crystallex people and study of court documents. I analyzed Dome as lying over 1.5 years ago. I don't take marching orders from any journalist. I was the first internet journalist to proclaim that KRY was probably on the right track at 1.50 a share and Dome would lose the case. My "source"? Dome mine's obfuscation and prevarication itself! Cocky? Well you don't realize the way I have told my customers to play this stock. Just because I roast the popular press who don't do their research and take sides that are fuzzy doesn't make me an Asensio type cheerleader of cant. Take a slice off the ad hominem and get back on track. Asking stupid questions such as why would a liar lie won't get you any debating points. Do you really want to know? Well so do I. So I await the courts decision. Woods' opinions are not fact. They are opinion. He has his facts wrong. I think wilfuly. Maybe not. Perhaps he is just inaccurate. EC<:-}