To: Paul Engel who wrote (56764 ) 6/3/1998 1:05:00 PM From: Maverick Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
Intel's stock value; FTC staff backs antitrust; Edelstone acknowledges INTC might pre-announce an earning warning It's time to check in with the two high-profile analysts having a $64-billion squabble over the value of Intel Corp. (Nasdaq, INTC) The little disagreement between Thomas P. Kurlak of Merrill Lynch & Co. and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter's Mark Edelstone is bigger than bragging rights for big shots. It has to with one of the most widely held tech stocks in the land. mercurycenter.com BY ADAM LASHINSKY Mercury News Staff Writer It's time to check in with the two high-profile analysts having a $64-billion squabble over the value of Intel Corp. (Nasdaq, INTC) The little disagreement between Thomas P. Kurlak of Merrill Lynch & Co. and Morgan Stanley Dean Witter's Mark Edelstone is bigger than bragging rights for big shots. It has to with one of the most widely held tech stocks in the land. For now, though, the quarrel is over, and Kurlak is the winner. We last visited Kurlak and Edelstone when several weeks back, when one share of Intel was worth about $84. Kurlak, noting overcapacity in PCs and the deleterious impact of the sub-$1,000 computer, predicted Intel's shares were heading for ''a new low . . . in the 60s.'' Edelstone, predicting a second-half surge from new Intel chips, set a 12-month price target of $110. Intel closed Tuesday at $69.25, a rebound from Monday's plunge to $68. It's impossible to overstate the importance of Intel's stock to the tech-investing crowd. It's one of the most widely held securities in the country. To wit, 18 million shares changed hands Tuesday, just a bit above the norm. So first to the man of the moment, New York-based Kurlak, who says ''things are pretty much following the track we had been estimating in this down cycle.'' Kurlak repeats the mantra Tuesday on the chip industry he has been pushing for the better part of a year: Overcapacity leads to lower earnings which lead to layoffs and reduced capital spending, and, ultimately, to lower stock prices. ''For whatever reason, investors have decided to focus on reality,'' he adds.