Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Gallery Resources (Alberta GYR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: William Jones who wrote (1264)	6/3/1998 2:57:00 PM
From: Kent C.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1829

This is from the Gallery Resources Stockhouse forum: Posted by: SHILO Subject: VERBISKI IN ON PLAY Date: 5/25/98 07:47 GYR.......HAS A NEW MAN TO HELP OUT VIC FRENCH......THIS IS A GOOD PLAN FOR BRUCE COSTERD......VERBISKI WAS INSTRUMENTAL IN THE MAIN VOISEY FIND WITH CHISLETT....LOOKS LIKE GYR....HAS A COUPLE OF EXCITING PLAYS WITH OKAK AND HARP LAKE AS WELL AS IT'S SOUTH VOISEY PROPERTY....KEEP AN EYE ON THIS ONE AND WATCH IT HIT THE MOON BEFORS DML...AND NAI....GET IN NOW...BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE....I TOLD YOU SO......GOOD LUCK ....BOTTOM FISHERS stockhouse.com there is no cost to post on Stockhouse forums

To: William Jones who wrote (1264)	6/3/1998 3:09:00 PM
From: 1king	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1829

William, I am not telling, nor have I ever told, anyone what to think. I do not really care, everyone has the right to an opinion and they can all differ. I never mentioned Phoenix in either a positive or negative setting. so why do you imply I put the company down. I called the play grass roots not the company, this was clear. I was implying that some geophysics should be done before any drilling. A general statement on exploration. The extra "this" was a typo as the extra "quote" indicates. That is the promo comment I was referring to. It is general and positive as most are and should be. But MT is not a "high precision" survey, in terms of resolution. Period It does not "precisely" define drill targets. Period It may or may not locate an orebody at 4kms. A statement like this requires evidence. I humbly request that you provide it to all on this thread as it seems to support your point of view. The survey at Voisey did not "accurately" outline the "massive" orebody. It was effective in some regards but not in the context presented here. Please feel free to form whatever opinion you wish. Regards 1King