SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : GMD RESOURCE -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Rich Kaiser who wrote (730)6/3/1998 2:09:00 PM
From: VAUGHN  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1030
 
Hello Rich

I had noted from your bio that you did not work for GMD so assummed that you did for a promotional firm.

Investors had the slick approach from past management and I suspect will be nervous if they detect it again. The tone of your reply is appreciated.

Fall drilling is fine, and I appreciate that there is little David can do to speed things up however, a fall kimberlite intersection in the NWT is like petting and having the lights come on on the porch. Kinda gets you hot and bothered then leaves you hanging around till your next date (spring).

David needs to do all he can to develop interest this summer. If we want appreciation (so GMD can float some shares?) drilling progress and results need to come out on a bi-weekly basis in at least August with geochemical & EM results released bi-weekly throughout July and June. If you waite untile September the story will be over as soon as you pull your last drill core.

However, if you can pull a core with a strike, announce assays a few weeks later and drill either a second strike and/or a larger sample with delineation, then investors have something to sink their teeth, hopes and $$ into over the winter.

Please try to find out details about those geochemical samples?
Chromite size?
Magnesium, Calcium content of Pyropes, etc? Ratio?
Surface testures?
Preservation halos?
Eclogitic content?
Ratio of G-10's to G-9's?

The size of EM targets? Proximity of dyke swarms and structural corridores? Type of host rock in the general area and specifically around the targets? The size of lakes on top of targets or if they outcrop on land?

Etc.

Regards



To: Rich Kaiser who wrote (730)6/5/1998 4:29:00 PM
From: Rich Kaiser  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1030
 
Hi Vaughin,

It came to my attention that I said that the Aero-survey was in 50 meter spacing. I meant 150 meter spacing... I type quicker then I can think.

Sorry for any confusion.

With Best Regards,

Rich