Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : INFE ... Infocall another Sleeper -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: macker who wrote (2841)	6/3/1998 6:02:00 PM
From: Lucky	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 10343

Do you honestly think that anyone short back in February has not covered by now?Any short position now would of been recently established,likely in the past 3-4 days at most. If you are waiting for a short squeeze you are way too late now.Do not buy this stock or any stock based on getting in on a short squeeze.Look what happened to RMIL.Too many people go broke waiting for shorts to be squeezed. Buy INFE because you think the company can produce earnings.

To: macker who wrote (2841)	6/3/1998 6:06:00 PM
From: RocketMan	Respond to of 10343

>>Buy INFE because you think the company can produce earnings<< (from unLucky's post) Ah... unLucky, not only did you miss on the short position, but if you did any DD you would not have to think the company can produce earnings, you would know. State Dept contract, IBM contract, duhh.... and a 3 million share short position. And you are working with a mickey mouse short account you just talked your broker into setting up for you???? ROTFLMAO

To: macker who wrote (2841)	6/3/1998 6:10:00 PM
From: dwlima	Respond to of 10343

a short position only indicates one significant thing: there are people that have chosen the wrong side. Although the size will exacerbate our price movements- one thing is for sure...we will head to a fair valuation in the days to come. personally, from what i know of macker, i trust his info. above anyone else. however, even if he were wrong on the short position (which would be wrong for the first time), i don't think it will stop us from seeing the teens soon. people play this game by: 1) betting for or against companies based on arbitrary price gains/losses 2) people buy on expected news and sell when it comes 3) buy and wait short time...when they are not millionaires within a short time- they switch to another stock. 4) etc. i play based on CONTENT. how about that for a change. i don't sell if the content of a news release demonstartes to me that i have bought into a severely undervalued company. Macker provides us with content and more of it than most anyone else here. so, if you want to challenge him or anyone else that has their shi! together, use facts. like i said yesterday, if anyone can prove that ICVI, INFE or DGIV are overvalued- just PM me. so far, no PMs. dwlima

To: macker who wrote (2841)	6/3/1998 9:45:00 PM
From: Theo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 10343

Macker, you forgot to include the 1.5 million shares that were shorted in february that havent been covered yet, which by the way came across the ticker but were never added to the volume for the day by the mm's, pretty slick heh. thats why tom richfield was so ticked back then, several people with level 2 have verified this fact for me(if anybody else saw it,.. Anybody doubts that can go ask TokyoMex for an unbiased response. He and his group were trying to run it at the time for a momentum play. Started to really climb ($.50+ I think) When he got hammered... He was NOT a happy camper. Just a FWIW 2 cent post by me <g> Theo