Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (56923)	6/3/1998 7:05:00 PM
From: Diamond Jim	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

especially now that we know that their is not going to be a significant miss for this quarter. == We do, how do WE know this ? jim

To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (56923)	6/3/1998 7:08:00 PM
From: Sundar Rajan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

>> Intel has said that it has not changed its guidance for Q2. This does not mean that they WILL NOT preannounce. I remember about six months back when QNTM or WDC rumors were circulating nad the companies denied they wer going to pre-announce. Yet aftet 2 weeks they DID preannounce. Maybe they didn't want to validate the rumors at that time.

To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (56923)	6/3/1998 7:49:00 PM
From: Steve Porter	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Fred, What I am referring to is the recent earnings "revisions" by the analysts. Intel hasn't "officially" changed it's guidance for Q2 becuase the analysts have done it for them. Therefore the analysts have warned by about $0.05 on behalf OF Intel. Intel doesn't have to say anything now, because most estimates are $.05 lower than 2 months ago.. Do you understand what I am trying to say here. Intel DOESN'T have to warn. No need to now that the analysts have revised their estimates w/o Intel's guidance. They'll make the new numbers (maybe, with 5-10% like you said). Steve