SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : NEXTEL -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ed Pittman who wrote (6504)6/3/1998 10:38:00 PM
From: Bernie Diamond  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10227
 
Ed, Holding the line. <g>. BTW, in your previous post you mentioned <<...Then you have to think about tax loss selling.>> In general I don't believe in selling a stock because of tax consequences. Either its worth holding or not. In other words, I wouldn't sell N at a loss (if that came to pass) to offset a gain in another taxable stock. Because of the "wash sale" rule I couldn't buy it back for 30 days and use the tax write-off advantage, and as luck would have it, the stock takes off during those 30 days. Also, in N's case, there's no comparable stock, IMO, that I could own while waiting for the 30 days to pass so that I could buy it back.

Now, suppose N goes to 50 (could happen - thinking positive) this December and I feel its fully valued for the forseeable future. I would sell and not say, "If I keep it 18 months, I'll only be taxed at 20% of my capital gain, so I'll hold it until then." That too IMO would be a mistake.

What's your take?

Bernie, super accountant Al. I know that you don't need a joker like me to ruin your business, especially with our stocks behaving badly.