Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : Corporate Vision (CVIA) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: gerry who wrote (5435)	6/4/1998 8:48:00 AM
From: K A Anderson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6654

Gerry I have hard documents of everything, all the money the Reg S people everything... they start playing games with the money, things quickly escalate from civil litigation. We were awarded 1. A proxy vote for a board of directors and any other issues we want to attach (federal Law) 2. To review the corporate records (state laws) 3. To hold the corporate assets in place until the new BOD has a chance to review them. (another SEC Law) Now so if they want to challenge us in court, which law do you think they will ask the Judge to break? LMAO let them bring it on... KAA

To: gerry who wrote (5435)	6/4/1998 12:07:00 PM
From: campe	Respond to of 6654

I'm not surprised that CVIA/WOTD was not represented by counsel at the hearing yesterday. After all, we have reports that CVIA's lawyer gave certain advice to Jack which was not followed, in fact, Jack did the exact opposite. I'm sure the lawyer would rather have missed this hearing and if I were him, I would be looking for a way to dump this client. After all, an uncooperative defendant is a sure fire way of loosing a case and damaging your reputation... In this case, if I were the lawyer, I would have told them that I would go to the hearing if THEY go too. Anyone think this is what happened???